Timeline for What should we do to reduce the risk of a Reddit-like crisis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2015 at 3:49 | vote | accept | Monica Cellio | ||
| Jul 4, 2015 at 22:24 | comment | added | senshin | @Emrakul For the record, in the particular case of reddit, moderators are not bound by any agreement beyond that which binds regular users (the terms of service, I guess). Anybody can become a moderator, and the process requires no administrative oversight. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 16:38 | history | edited | user35 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 131 characters in body
|
| Jul 4, 2015 at 10:12 | comment | added | user35 | We're not just talking about unpaid moderators, though; we're also talking about employees. Besides, there's likely to be a moderator agreement anyway, like there is here. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 10:10 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Irrelevant when we're talking about unpaid moderators. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 10:08 | comment | added | user35 | @Gilles I'm not talking about free speech, I'm talking about employment and contract law. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 10:06 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | There's a lot of good advice here, but there's one I can't condone: “know your rights”. That's good advice in some circumstances, but here, it's utterly irrelevant. This is a problem of communication; if it gets into rights, it's already gone wrong. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 0:11 | history | edited | user35 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 296 characters in body
|
| Jul 3, 2015 at 23:47 | history | answered | user35 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |