Timeline for What should we do to reduce the risk of a Reddit-like crisis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 4, 2015 at 3:21 | history | suggested | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved some grammar
|
| Jul 4, 2015 at 3:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 4, 2015 at 3:21 | |||||
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:54 | comment | added | Sibin Grasic | Allow me to correct myself - Fame getting to his head didn't cause any problems on Facebook itself :) | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:33 | comment | added | Mason Wheeler | @SibinGrasic: Did you seriously just claim that Mark Zuckerberg hasn't let fame go to his head?!? | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:19 | comment | added | Sibin Grasic | And both reddit and 4chan made the same mistake that Digg did years ago. They attempted to censor free speech on platforms designed to encourage it! | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:15 | comment | added | Sibin Grasic | Even though Zuckerberg "created" Facebook, he started bringing people and expanding early. Went from "startup" to company phase very fast. 4chan was m00t only, he tried monetizing 4chan since the beginning. Redit was several people, and was in "startup" phase for a very long time. Difference between reddit / 4chan and facebook - Zuckerberg didn't let the fame go to his head. Both m00t and alexis started viewing themselves as "venture capitalists" | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:13 | comment | added | Andy | Just curious, why do you say they are unique because they were built by younger people trying to monitize? Several other sites were built by the younger generation (Facebook comes to mind as the largest) | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 1:10 | history | answered | Sibin Grasic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |