The chat regulars on ELL unanimously agree on the fact that it suffers from a lack of avid editors. While we have a fairly large user base in comparison to sites almost as old as us (111 users with more than 2,000 rep and 203 with more than 1,000; query here) there is only a handful of everyday editors; many questions don't end up being edited and that's disheartening to people like me. If you check the weekly editors list, I'm not even there.

There are a few problems that prevent me from being able to do something extraordinary. I don't want to add unnecessary fluff as to why, but contacting/bothering mods, for instance, is my last option.

The gamification system Stack Exchange provides is really useful, but it doesn't really work here. There are no reputation points being awarded for edits, and there are only three explicit badges for editing: Editor, Strunk & White and Copy Editor. Editor is very easily awarded, but it might be that the other two are unreachable for someone who begins to learn how to edit, and thus aren't encouraging enough. Heck, after earning those badges, there's no digital numbers or rewards.

Ideally, the incentive for editing would be a pleasant feeling of I'm helping the site's quality/the OP/the site grow - AKA the feeling of being a valuable charitable member of the community. However, I believe this is too much to expect from a normal or new member, one that still hasn't grown feelings and passion towards the community.

As a normal but very active user on meta and chat, how can I get more people to help in editing?

Addendum: A lack of meta consensus on some issues could be a contributing factor, but it's definitely not that critical to be the main culprit of this - sorry for a lack of a better word - apathy towards editing.


1 Answer 1


I guess this is a problem that's mostly network-wide.

One things that SE does differently than a lot of other forums is that you, as normal, avid user, can actually gain rights to become a little helper of the moderators. You can actively edit post, vote to delete them, organize tags and so on.

Many users may not be used to this as the gamification system is progressive and unlocks "features" by gaining reputation. There's no one universal who approves your actions and you are basically left alone to figure out how things are working. There's no advisor who says what is best practice or how things should be preferably handled. By not having a person who approves your actions, users may feel uneasy about particular tasks. They might feel that uneasy that they just leave out to fulfill their "duty" to help out the community (a major point of a progressive reputation system).

How can you get more people to edit posts?

You start off by telling the users to edit their own posts. In a large community, almost always there's someone guarding the place by editing single posts to increase the overall quality. Don't do that. Show users that they can correct their own mistakes by clicking the edit button. Tell them what they should do:

  • Can you provide additional information, please?
  • Can you clarify your question, please?
  • Can you edit your title to match your question, please?

All these requests help to lower the fear of doing something wrong. If you encourage users actively to correct their own mistakes by showing them the best practice, they will grow confident and become self-reliant. And self-reliance is what you want to achieve in this kind of reputation system. Show them how to do it and they will execute it that way.

You can discuss the matter on the meta site corresponding to your main site. It's an issue which is a bother. If it bothers you, you can discuss it. Say that you think that more people should edit so they actual workload among the regular editors becomes less and the review queue is cleared more quickly. Most users won't do anything if you don't ask them to do something. They follow rules because they read them. They follow guidelines because you asked them to do so. They don't edit because you haven't asked them.

The key problem of a self-moderating community is that you usually don't have a sandbox to test out your corrections and rights. Everything you apply, if you have sufficient reputation, is put in place immediately. Just imagine someone just reached the threshold to cast a close vote, would you like to mess it up immediately? I don't think so. There's a delay between actually gaining the technical power and the ability to apply.

Imagine that you are hired, you're new to the company and you don't know your colleagues. Even though you're in the same position, you don't know how to use your newly gained rights. You need to get the hang of it. I haven't started immediately reviewing as I gained the right, I needed 500 more reputation to feel confident enough. One thing you should consider here that users who participate in others communities and already have gone through such a learning process are going to edit way more quickly. They just have to get used to the sites practices and the people, but not to the technical power.

Eventually, there's the point laziness. Even though, you gain technical power, there are others users who gain power, too, so there's no need that I must help, right? This can be the thinking of some users, there are lots of others users who have the same or even a higher reputation so they should be able to take care of the formalities. This is a common misjudgement, even in other communities. You have to get it straight. Everybody is absolutely welcomed to help out so the workload is getting smaller. You, as user, are encouraged to help out to help other users by getting their posts reviewed and answered faster.

The summary of this is:

  • Encourage your users to edit their own posts to become confident and get used to your way of handling things.
  • Discuss the matter on your meta site and ask for the opinions of other high reputation users and reviewers.
  • Encourage active helping. Everyone who helps, helps another new user. And never forget: We were new to this site somewhen too!
  • Take the little delay between gaining technical power and gaining the ability to apply it into account. People need to get used to the technical power be able to do stuff (if they haven't been a moderator in the past or are high reputation user on another SE site).
  • Build up self-reliance. If users can solve problems themselves, they most likely have the confidence to tell other people how to solve problems.
  • SE is based on a progressive reputation system. In order to make the best use of it, you should give advise to those seeking it. Explain to them how things work and redirect them to detailed help pages so they can get the hang of it.

If you are open-minded and helpful, other users may feel encouraged enough to help out by reviewing. You have to minimize the factor of fear. The fear of doing something wrong.

  • Thoughtful answer. So the solution does boil down to more work for me, but I'm happy if that'll help ELL's overall post quality evaluate.
    – M.A.R.
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 20:33
  • 2
    @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M also note that typing [edit] auto converts into a link for the edit of the post, so if you write, "can you [edit] this with more information?" types of posts it's an easy way to do this. On Workplace I frequently suggest others to use that part of the site. Example: edit this!
    – enderland
    Commented Sep 30, 2015 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.