Timeline for How should new members of an organizations' leadership pledge to uphold its core purpose and values?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2016 at 18:15 | answer | added | Greg Chase | timeline score: 2 | |
May 7, 2016 at 18:05 | comment | added | Greg Chase | Edited again to try and generalize your question. Hopefully it still fits your specific ask. | |
May 7, 2016 at 18:05 | history | edited | Greg Chase | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tried to edit the question to make it fit what the asker seems to intend.
|
May 7, 2016 at 17:57 | comment | added | Greg Chase | I read it as a pledge to uphold the values and purpose of the organization while becoming part of the governance. It states no consequences or definition of nonconformance. | |
May 7, 2016 at 13:41 | comment | added | porton | @GregChase I have actually created the document to sign: withoutvowels.org/wiki/File:New-member-commitment.pdf | |
May 6, 2016 at 5:16 | comment | added | Greg Chase | I'm trying to parse what your question is here. Hopefully you like by edit to the title. What is the purpose of having the voting members agree to a pledge? Do you want them to simply agree and understand the purpose of the organization? Or is there an actual contract or consequence that gets invoked if they fail to live by the terms of the pledge they are agreeing to? | |
May 6, 2016 at 5:15 | history | edited | Greg Chase | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Turned title into the question being asked
|
May 6, 2016 at 0:18 | comment | added | user35 | This sounds like a question for a lawyer. | |
May 5, 2016 at 22:51 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 4, 2016 at 22:51 | |||||
May 5, 2016 at 22:50 | history | asked | porton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |