Skip to main content
added 19 characters in body
Source Link
user35
user35

A good rule of thumb for moderation is: ifIf it's allowed, expect it to happen eventually.

Why does moderation exist? And here's another one: Users always need to be held accountable for what they say on your site.

This is the philosophicalall-important question which: Why do we moderate? This philosophically drives the answer to your question. The answer, in short, and however each community defines it, is: to prevent things from getting out of hand.

Of course, each community defines this and sees this differently. Forum culture, for instance, might not consider noise replies ("Thanks!") 'getting out of hand,' whereas Stack Exchange does. Each subreddit defines their own rules of moderation.

When you introduce an unmoderated section, you are telling people that everything goes. In short: yes, you have to expect things like this to happen. The fact that the 'authority' has created a moderation-free space implies that it's totally okay with administrators for users to go and do/say whatever they want, when in reality, it very much isn't.

In other words, if you have an unmoderated section, you are allowing everything. Death threats, harassment, violence... all of it becomes acceptable in this one little space. So, when do moderators step in?

Draw the line somewhere. It's okay to have a section which is less stringent about content and topic control, since this allows people to vent some frustration and/or post off-topic content, but make sure you know where your boundaries are and strictly adhere to them.

A good rule of thumb for moderation is: if it's allowed, expect it to happen eventually.

Why does moderation exist?

This is the philosophical question which drives the answer to your question. The answer, in short, and however each community defines it, is: to prevent things from getting out of hand.

Of course, each community defines this and sees this differently. Forum culture, for instance, might not consider noise replies ("Thanks!") 'getting out of hand,' whereas Stack Exchange does. Each subreddit defines their own rules of moderation.

When you introduce an unmoderated section, you are telling people that everything goes. In short: yes, you have to expect things like this to happen. The fact that the 'authority' has created a moderation-free space implies that it's totally okay with administrators for users to go and do/say whatever they want, when in reality, it very much isn't.

In other words, if you have an unmoderated section, you are allowing everything. Death threats, harassment, violence... all of it becomes acceptable in this one little space. So, when do moderators step in?

Draw the line somewhere. It's okay to have a section which is less stringent about content and topic control, since this allows people to vent some frustration and/or post off-topic content, but make sure you know where your boundaries are and strictly adhere to them.

A good rule of thumb for moderation is: If it's allowed, expect it to happen eventually.

And here's another one: Users always need to be held accountable for what they say on your site.

This is the all-important question: Why do we moderate? This philosophically drives the answer to your question. The answer, in short, and however each community defines it, is: to prevent things from getting out of hand.

Of course, each community defines this and sees this differently. Forum culture, for instance, might not consider noise replies ("Thanks!") 'getting out of hand,' whereas Stack Exchange does. Each subreddit defines their own rules of moderation.

When you introduce an unmoderated section, you are telling people that everything goes. In short: yes, you have to expect things like this to happen. The fact that the 'authority' has created a moderation-free space implies that it's totally okay with administrators for users to go and do/say whatever they want, when in reality, it very much isn't.

In other words, if you have an unmoderated section, you are allowing everything. Death threats, harassment, violence... all of it becomes acceptable in this one little space. So, when do moderators step in?

Draw the line somewhere. It's okay to have a section which is less stringent about content and topic control, since this allows people to vent some frustration and/or post off-topic content, but make sure you know where your boundaries are and strictly adhere to them.

Source Link
user35
user35

A good rule of thumb for moderation is: if it's allowed, expect it to happen eventually.

Why does moderation exist?

This is the philosophical question which drives the answer to your question. The answer, in short, and however each community defines it, is: to prevent things from getting out of hand.

Of course, each community defines this and sees this differently. Forum culture, for instance, might not consider noise replies ("Thanks!") 'getting out of hand,' whereas Stack Exchange does. Each subreddit defines their own rules of moderation.

When you introduce an unmoderated section, you are telling people that everything goes. In short: yes, you have to expect things like this to happen. The fact that the 'authority' has created a moderation-free space implies that it's totally okay with administrators for users to go and do/say whatever they want, when in reality, it very much isn't.

In other words, if you have an unmoderated section, you are allowing everything. Death threats, harassment, violence... all of it becomes acceptable in this one little space. So, when do moderators step in?

Draw the line somewhere. It's okay to have a section which is less stringent about content and topic control, since this allows people to vent some frustration and/or post off-topic content, but make sure you know where your boundaries are and strictly adhere to them.