Timeline for How do you justify moderator actions that are based on secret information?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 7, 2021 at 19:22 | history | suggested | Later |
Added a tag.
|
|
| Jan 31, 2021 at 7:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 7, 2021 at 19:22 | |||||
| Jan 31, 2021 at 7:24 | answer | added | Later | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 22:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 30, 2014 at 9:53 | |||||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:51 | answer | added | Bill the Lizard | timeline score: 40 | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | nhinkle | I think that's wise for the question to be SE agnostic, and my example is from SE experience, but it could certainly apply on other sites as well. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:42 | comment | added | user21 | @nhinkle I intentionally avoided any specific examples to avoid making this question SE-specific. But that was certainly one of the examples I was thinking of. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 21:31 | |||||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:33 | comment | added | nhinkle | A good example of this problem is when you have evidence of voting manipulation, and the user demands to know which user was "allegedly" upvoting them unfairly. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:29 | history | asked | user21 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |